Thursday, June 04, 2026

The Tragedy of Ideas: How intellectuals lead history astray ...

It is often assumed that philosophical, psychological, sociological, and literary works cannot be held responsible for what later unfolds in the societies from which they emerge.

With that assumption in mind, I have spent considerable time reading many influential thinkers of the early twentieth century: Carl Jung, Martin Heidegger, Oswald Spengler, Carl Schmitt, and others. One of the more important, and troubling, discoveries has been the realization that some of these thinkers can, in varying degrees, be regarded as having planted intellectual seeds that later contributed to profound historical tragedies.

I am not suggesting that all of them bear equal responsibility. Their biographies, intentions, and philosophical trajectories differ greatly. Yet it is difficult to ignore the fact that many recognized the nature of the evil only too late, or failed to recognize it fully at all.

In that spirit, I am currently reading Emmanuel Faye's Heidegger: The Introduction of Nazism into Philosophy in Light of the Unpublished Seminars of 1933–1935.

See the quote about Being and Time:

"... the developments on the historicality of existence (and therefore of existence, and therefore of the entire work, since everything converges on the sections concerning historicality), the ideas that are at the very foundation of National Socialist doctrine are already present, namely, those of a community of destiny and of a community of the people: the Gemeinschaft understood as Schicksalsgemeinschaft and Volksgemeinschaft."

At the same time, I am reading Jung's Red Book, where one can also discern signs of what was to come, although Jung's intellectual and personal journey differs profoundly from Heidegger's.

There is much more to say on this subject....

Poland, June 4, 2026

Quotes from Emmanuel Faye's Heidegger ...

"Claus had shown the racist thumbprint of his doctrine as early as 1923, with the publication of  The Nordic Soul. That work is a major factor. It allows the reader to see how, before Heidegger, a phenomenologist formed by Husserl was able to claim he was using Husserl's method in proposing as early as 1923 a description of what is at the very basis of Nazism - namely, the communal destiny of a people united by blood. Because of this circumstance, a meticulous comparison of Claus's Nordic Soul with Heidegger's Being and Time would be worth pursuing. "

Poland, June 6, 2026

" ... Rothacker twice identifies Clauß closely with Heidegger, and the racial doctrine of The Nordic Soul with the existentialism of Being and Time, apropos of the “correlativity between world and man,” according to which “the world in which a man lives is in a strict relation of exchange with his being.” This thesis leads Rothacker to speak of “struggles for life,” for “we not only in each instance have our world: we affirm our world.” Thus what is at stake here is affirmation (Behauptung) in combat, a central motif shared by Rothacker, Baeumler, and Heidegger, which is one of the commonplaces of Nazi doctrine."

Poland, June 7, 2026


 



Saturday, March 21, 2026

At last, I finished reading Sloterdijk’s Spheres - a four-year intellectual journey

Peter Sloterdijk - drawing by Siegfried Woldhek
Peter Sloterdijk; drawing by Siegfried Woldhek

Today I finished reading Peter Sloterdijk’s magnum opus, Spheres, in its three volumes. It has been an extraordinary experience, one that lasted four years for me. If I were to sum it up in a single sentence, I would say this: Spheres is perhaps the most advanced account of the human condition at the beginning of the twenty-first century, viewed in the context of its historical evolution since medieval times. Its governing metaphor is that of spheres of enclosure or safe havens in which people live: of many kinds: physical, social, and mental.


At the end of the work, Sloterdijk takes an unusual and remarkable step: he offers a kind of self-review from the perspectives of theologian, literary critic, and macro-historian. In doing so, he reveals a striking degree of self-awareness and self-criticism, fully conscious of the delicate and highly particular character of the claims and analyses he advances throughout the book.

I strongly recommend it to anyone who wants to better understand the human condition at the dawn of the second quarter of the twenty-first century.

Here are my previous posts about this opus, many of them including important quotations from the book:

https://sopekmir.blogspot.com/2022/11/spheres-by-peter-sloterdijk-one-of-most.html

https://sopekmir.blogspot.com/2023/08/concluding-reading-of-sloterdijk.html

https://sopekmir.blogspot.com/2023/11/macrospherology-of-humans-globes-volume.html

https://sopekmir.blogspot.com/2024/12/republic-of-spaces-foams-third-volume.html 


Lodz, March 21th, 2026
PS. The drawing from https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/10/12/peter-sloterdijk-blowing-bubbles/ 

The Tragedy of Ideas: How intellectuals lead history astray ...

It is often assumed that philosophical, psychological, sociological, and literary works cannot be held responsible for what later unfolds in...